← All tools

Tool 71: Regression and Recoupment: The ESY Case You Build Over Christmas Break

THE RULE

Extended school year (ESY) services are special education and related services provided beyond the normal school year, in accordance with the child’s IEP, at no cost to the parent, and meeting the standards of the state education agency (34 C.F.R. § 300.106(b)). The district must ensure they are available as necessary to provide a free appropriate public education (34 C.F.R. § 300.106(a)(1)).

The decision belongs to the IEP team, and it is made one child at a time. The regulation says ESY services “must be provided only if” the IEP team determines, on an individual basis, that the services are necessary for the provision of a free appropriate public education to the child (34 C.F.R. § 300.106(a)(2)). Read both halves of that sentence. It means no child gets ESY without an individual determination - and it means no child can be denied ESY by a rule that skips the individual determination. The district may not limit ESY to particular disability categories, and it may not unilaterally limit the type, amount, or duration of the services (34 C.F.R. § 300.106(a)(3)(i)-(ii)).

The federal regulation does not use the words “regression” or “recoupment.” ESY is required only when the IEP team determines, individually, that it is necessary for FAPE (34 C.F.R. § 300.106(a)(2)). States may use regression, recoupment, and other factors under § 300.106(a)(3), but no single state formula is the federal test. Use the 50-State Companion before framing the evidence.

That is why this tool is about data and not about law. Whatever standard your state uses, you are a member of the IEP team (34 C.F.R. § 300.321(a)(1)). In developing the IEP, the team must consider the concerns of the parents for enhancing the education of the child (34 C.F.R. § 300.324(a)(1)(ii)). In reviewing and revising it, the team must revise as appropriate to address information about the child provided to, or by, the parents (34 C.F.R. § 300.324(b)(1)(ii)(C)). Data you collect is information you provide.

The measure you use should be the measure the IEP already names. Your child’s IEP states how progress toward each annual goal will be measured (34 C.F.R. § 300.320(a)(3)(i)). Use that same instrument, and the district is arguing with its own ruler.

WHY IT MATTERS

Every ESY meeting has the same shape. You say your child fell apart over the summer. The district says the data do not show significant regression. Then everyone looks at the table.

The long break is a natural experiment, and it runs whether or not you measure it. School stops for 2 weeks in December. Instruction stops. Practice stops. If your child’s skills are fragile, they slip. When school starts again, the child spends 2 weeks, or 6, climbing back to where the child already was in December. That climb is instructional time spent on ground your child had already taken.

The problem in April is not that the regression did not happen. The problem is that nobody wrote it down while it was happening. Memory is not a data set. “He lost everything over Christmas” is a sentence a team can absorb without moving.

Numbers change that conversation. What the child could do the week before the break. What the child could do the week after. And one more: how many school days it took to get back. Winter break gives you all 3, and it gives them to you in January, months before the spring meeting where the ESY decision gets made.