← All d.c. tools

D.C. Tool 25: Motions, and the deadline that swallows them

Reviewed previewThis page shows the reviewed public portion and the exact outline of the member edition.What the labels mean

THE RULE

Motions practice in the District runs on a schedule that hides in plain sight inside the five-business-day disclosure rule. Motions must be in writing, filed with the hearing officer with a copy to the Office of Dispute Resolution, and are due by the same five-business-day disclosure deadline that governs exhibits and witness lists, absent good cause shown for a later filing (ODR SOP 709.C.1, 2, 4-5). Oppositions to a motion are due within three business days of the motion's filing (SOP Section 709.C.1, 2, and 4 through 5), and silence in response to a motion may be treated as concession, meaning a parent who does not respond to an LEA motion within that window risks having it granted uncontested.

Continuances run on a related but distinct track. Only the hearing officer decides whether good cause exists, though the parties' joint agreement to a continuance is generally treated as good cause on its own. A continuance request must ordinarily be made in writing by the same five-business-day deadline, with one recognized exception for a continuance sought because of witness unavailability, which can be raised later. The hearing officer is expected to rule within five business days of the request, any continuance granted extends the hearing only for the duration actually needed, and continuances are unavailable at all in expedited discipline proceedings (SOP § 710(D)(8)(d)).

Bifurcation motions, raised where a reimbursement claim's unilateral-placement appropriateness question might be tried separately from the agency's-program-appropriateness question (DC-Tool 23, DC-Tool 32), sit inside this same framework by default rather than under any dedicated procedure. The statute grants the hearing officer bifurcation authority without attaching a specific procedural trigger, bifurcation does not appear among the prehearing conference's enumerated topics, and it fits, when raised, as an unnamed example under the SOP's general, non-exhaustive motions list, governed by the five-day disclosure deadline like any other motion absent good cause (ODR SOP 709.B). No sampled HOD in the register documents an actual granted or denied bifurcation motion, so this remains underdeveloped practice; raise it early and directly with the assigned hearing officer rather than relying on an assumed default outcome.

WHY IT MATTERS

The five-business-day rule is easy to misread as an evidence deadline alone, something that governs exhibits and witness lists and nothing else. It is, in the same breath, the outside date for filing most motions, including a bifurcation request on a reimbursement claim that a parent might not think to characterize as a "motion" at all until it is too late to file one without showing good cause for the delay. A parent who treats disclosure day as only about paperwork can walk past the actual deadline for the procedural motion that would have shaped how the hearing itself runs.

The silence-as-concession rule does equally quiet damage. An LEA motion that arrives during a stressful stretch of hearing preparation, easy to set aside as something to answer later, can be granted by default if three business days pass without a written opposition. There is no separate reminder built into the system; the three-day clock runs whether or not anyone is watching it.